<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photo Critique - Mike Fuhl</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photocritic.org/photo-critique-mike-fuhl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photocritic.org/photo-critique-mike-fuhl/</link>
	<description>The Photocritic DIY photography projects blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan Roberts</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/photo-critique-mike-fuhl/#comment-14941</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/photo-critique-mike-fuhl/#comment-14941</guid>
		<description>The mock-up is terrible, spoils a nice sunset and the couple look like a vampire and his victim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mock-up is terrible, spoils a nice sunset and the couple look like a vampire and his victim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sendermen</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/photo-critique-mike-fuhl/#comment-13897</link>
		<dc:creator>Sendermen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/photo-critique-mike-fuhl/#comment-13897</guid>
		<description>This is a great review. The intention of the photos probably was capturing the experience of a specific moment. The sky was beautiful and that is what can be seen on the photo. But it brings no more than a digital copy of the experience of the beautiful sky, and a wonderful photo unfortunately (and fortunately) need more to have impact. The tips you give are just great! Keep up this photo critique, I like it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great review. The intention of the photos probably was capturing the experience of a specific moment. The sky was beautiful and that is what can be seen on the photo. But it brings no more than a digital copy of the experience of the beautiful sky, and a wonderful photo unfortunately (and fortunately) need more to have impact. The tips you give are just great! Keep up this photo critique, I like it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/photo-critique-mike-fuhl/#comment-13869</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 06:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/photo-critique-mike-fuhl/#comment-13869</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much for having me featured first in your new "Section", I feel honored !

However, I am grateful for your honesty ! Nothing to be sorry about !
I will surely consider your tips the next time I am shooting that kind of pictures !

Like I mentioned before, I like the idea for this new Section of your Blog and for my part it will asure you my "readership" ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for having me featured first in your new &#8220;Section&#8221;, I feel honored !</p>
<p>However, I am grateful for your honesty ! Nothing to be sorry about !<br />
I will surely consider your tips the next time I am shooting that kind of pictures !</p>
<p>Like I mentioned before, I like the idea for this new Section of your Blog and for my part it will asure you my &#8220;readership&#8221; ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
