<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Win a Canon 1Ds Mark II and other goodies!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photocritic.org/crestock-photo-competition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photocritic.org/crestock-photo-competition/</link>
	<description>The Photocritic DIY photography projects blog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Halvor Pedersen</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/crestock-photo-competition/#comment-77005</link>
		<dc:creator>Halvor Pedersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 05:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2007/crestock-photo-competition/#comment-77005</guid>
		<description>Hum. If I entered the second one and won, well... Well... It would be a nice guift for my dad... :)

However... I'd keep the EOS 1Ds MkII! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hum. If I entered the second one and won, well&#8230; Well&#8230; It would be a nice guift for my dad&#8230; :)</p>
<p>However&#8230; I&#8217;d keep the EOS 1Ds MkII! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigstusexy</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/crestock-photo-competition/#comment-73815</link>
		<dc:creator>bigstusexy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2007/crestock-photo-competition/#comment-73815</guid>
		<description>Oh man I'd love any of those prizes, I'll try to enter but I won't even make an honorable mention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man I&#8217;d love any of those prizes, I&#8217;ll try to enter but I won&#8217;t even make an honorable mention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haje Jan Kamps</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/crestock-photo-competition/#comment-72584</link>
		<dc:creator>Haje Jan Kamps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2007/crestock-photo-competition/#comment-72584</guid>
		<description>Hi Andrew 

You beat me to the comment I was going to make - Of course I carefully checked their Terms and Conditions, to make sure it didn't breach my own &lt;a href="http://www.photocritic.org/2007/be-careful-what-you-sign/" rel="nofollow"&gt;be careful what you sign&lt;/a&gt; advice :-)

For everybody else: the &lt;a href="http://www.crestock.com/blog/photography/contest2007/rules.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;rules&lt;/a&gt; to this competition are perfectly safe, and are not photographer unfriendly. Specifically:

&lt;blockquote&gt;8) By submitting a photograph to this contest, the photographer confirms that he/she is the creator of the photograph, and is in legal possession of its copyrights. &lt;strong&gt;The photographer retains the copyright of the photograph.&lt;/strong&gt;

11) By submitting a photograph to this contest, the photographer grants Crestock the rights to freely publish said image online or in other media in relation to the contest, without remuneration.

12) Photos submitted for the contest will not be entered into our image collection or re-sold in any way.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

(emphasis mine)

So basically, you keep the copyright, they reserve the right to use your photos in connection with the contest (which is fair enough, because otherwise they couldn't even show them on their website), and they promise not to sell the photos on or do other nasty things with them. 

I do laud you though, Andrew, for checking this -- if all photographers took a close look at the TnC's, we'd have a lot less problems!

- Haje</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrew </p>
<p>You beat me to the comment I was going to make - Of course I carefully checked their Terms and Conditions, to make sure it didn&#8217;t breach my own <a href="http://www.photocritic.org/2007/be-careful-what-you-sign/" rel="nofollow">be careful what you sign</a> advice :-)</p>
<p>For everybody else: the <a href="http://www.crestock.com/blog/photography/contest2007/rules.aspx" rel="nofollow">rules</a> to this competition are perfectly safe, and are not photographer unfriendly. Specifically:</p>
<blockquote><p>8) By submitting a photograph to this contest, the photographer confirms that he/she is the creator of the photograph, and is in legal possession of its copyrights. <strong>The photographer retains the copyright of the photograph.</strong></p>
<p>11) By submitting a photograph to this contest, the photographer grants Crestock the rights to freely publish said image online or in other media in relation to the contest, without remuneration.</p>
<p>12) Photos submitted for the contest will not be entered into our image collection or re-sold in any way.</p></blockquote>
<p>(emphasis mine)</p>
<p>So basically, you keep the copyright, they reserve the right to use your photos in connection with the contest (which is fair enough, because otherwise they couldn&#8217;t even show them on their website), and they promise not to sell the photos on or do other nasty things with them. </p>
<p>I do laud you though, Andrew, for checking this &#8212; if all photographers took a close look at the TnC&#8217;s, we&#8217;d have a lot less problems!</p>
<p>- Haje</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/crestock-photo-competition/#comment-72519</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2007/crestock-photo-competition/#comment-72519</guid>
		<description>It appears that Ive jumped the gun with that last comment. That quote was from their main ToS and not the specific contest ToS which says that the images will *not* be re-sold.

The fact that there's two conflicting policies is still kind of worrying to me though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that Ive jumped the gun with that last comment. That quote was from their main ToS and not the specific contest ToS which says that the images will *not* be re-sold.</p>
<p>The fact that there&#8217;s two conflicting policies is still kind of worrying to me though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/crestock-photo-competition/#comment-72516</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2007/crestock-photo-competition/#comment-72516</guid>
		<description>They reserve the right to sell your image via sub-licensing without giving you a dime. I don't really agree with that, so I have no plans to be entering this contest:

"By uploading Content to www.crestock.com, the Supplier admits a non-exclusive licence to display the uploaded Content on Crestock's homepage (www.crestock.com). Furthermore this allows Crestock to sub-licence the uploaded image to Crestock's customers for potential download. This in accordance with the terms of the Crestock Content Licence Agreement, a copy of which you have read, and acknowledge understanding and agreeing to."

http://www.crestock.com/popups/terms.aspx


&lt;a href="http://www.photocritic.org/2007/be-careful-what-you-sign/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Be careful what you sign&lt;/a&gt;, indeed! :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They reserve the right to sell your image via sub-licensing without giving you a dime. I don&#8217;t really agree with that, so I have no plans to be entering this contest:</p>
<p>&#8220;By uploading Content to <a href="http://www.crestock.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.crestock.com</a>, the Supplier admits a non-exclusive licence to display the uploaded Content on Crestock&#8217;s homepage (www.crestock.com). Furthermore this allows Crestock to sub-licence the uploaded image to Crestock&#8217;s customers for potential download. This in accordance with the terms of the Crestock Content Licence Agreement, a copy of which you have read, and acknowledge understanding and agreeing to.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.crestock.com/popups/terms.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.crestock.com/popups/terms.aspx</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photocritic.org/2007/be-careful-what-you-sign/" rel="nofollow">Be careful what you sign</a>, indeed! :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haje Jan Kamps</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/crestock-photo-competition/#comment-72352</link>
		<dc:creator>Haje Jan Kamps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2007/crestock-photo-competition/#comment-72352</guid>
		<description>anna: well, that's true, but this blog gets hundreds of thousands of visitors a month - they can't exclude everybody who reads it, either! That's just silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anna: well, that&#8217;s true, but this blog gets hundreds of thousands of visitors a month - they can&#8217;t exclude everybody who reads it, either! That&#8217;s just silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anna</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/crestock-photo-competition/#comment-72340</link>
		<dc:creator>anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2007/crestock-photo-competition/#comment-72340</guid>
		<description>Yeah...but if we actually know you, then we can't win either, that'd look WELL dodgy.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8230;but if we actually know you, then we can&#8217;t win either, that&#8217;d look WELL dodgy.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
