Portraiture: Borrow their soul!
A few years ago, I was part of a creative arts project in Arizona and southern Utah, where we did a lot of work with Native American people — a ‘world through our eyes’ type thing. One of the things that was brought up when we were dealing with more traditional tribes, was that we weren’t to take any photos. Perhaps surprisingly, some people believe that when you take photos of them, you steal a part of their soul.
Religions and superstitions aside, I think it’s a good way to look at portraiture. Stealing souls is a bit harsh, but if your photographs don’t at least borrow a little bit of soul from your subjects, I believe you may have failed as a photographer.
For this article, I’ve chosen to do a critique some of the photos submitted to me by Isaac - an USC film student with a passion for photography. His images illustrate very well how adding a touch of feel (or soul, if you will) can lift your portraiture.
With his photos, Isaac included a note. Now, normally, I don’t pay much heed to what people say about their photos: if they can’t stand on themselves, they aren’t worth critiqueing. In this case, I made an exception: Essentially, Isaac is begging to be kicked to the kerb:
Compliments are nice, but for someone in my position they are useless - I’m a newb and I need people to tear my work apart so that I can improve. Please, please, I beg you, be as harsh as you possibly can. Thanks.
… Which I would have done, if his pictures were actually bad. Luckily, they aren’t. Without any further ado…
Isaac’s first photo has is titled ‘arms’:
At first, I wasn’t quite sure what to feel about this photo. It’s terribly messy, and you can’t actually see anything of what is going on. I’m also not a big fan of the photographer being reflected in the camera, on a general basis. In this one, however, the expression of the photo comes together in a wonderful way.
To me, it seems as if this photo is taken in a changing room. The girls are performers, preparing to go on stage, perhaps. The girl on the left is showing a slightly worried expression, and is looking at the photographer through her hand in the mirror, while the other model is completely obscured in what seems like a dancer’s pose. Is she snapping her fingers? Is she fixing her hair?
The tension in this photo — and much of its soul — comes from the tension in the photograph. The photographer is intruding into a world where he doesn’t belong, and the way the models obscure their own face almost seems as a defensive gesture, even though the body language of both girls are very open.
Along with the tension and the colour repetition (there is only one accent colour, and it’s pink. It’s reflected in the light source, on the photographer’s shirt, in the left girl’s hair band and the right girl’s top), the thing that intrigues me about this photo is that you can follow the path of the light. Take the left model, for example, you can see her head, then her head in the mirror. You can then follow the light beam through the hand which is obscuring her face, which you can also see in the mirror, and then into the photographic lens. As a photographer, this multi-layered self-referential image is very appealing and exciting to me.
On a technical level, I would probably have tidied the image up a little bit. Darken the background more, black out the writing (on the mirror? On the photographer’s shirt?), and get rid of everything to the left of the left model, and to the right of the right model. Once that has been done, it will increase the focus of the photograph.
The final thing which makes this image really work for me, is that if anyone has had their soul ’stolen’ in this image, it’s the photographer himself. The models are obscured, and the only person who you can connect with (despite the camera stuck in front of his face), is the person taking the photo.
A powerful, cheeky, and inventive photo indeed.
In Isaac’s second photo, entitled Mika, he’s using a different set of techniques:
In a way, I really wanted to read a lot of meaning into this photo, but there’s something about it which doesn’t quite allow that for me. The car in itself is delightfully dilapidated, and the dirt, decay and entropy it and the background represents makes a fantastic backdrop for telling a story.
The model is beautiful, and very well captured on your behalf. The problem I have with the image, however, is that she just doesn’t look quite right in her circumstances. The way she is dressed and posed gives the photo an impression of ‘look! an old car! let’s take a picture on it’. If she was dressed differently, there would have been an opportunity for a whole series of different stories worth telling. Dressed very beautifully and glamorously, it could be a story of being lost / being out of ones element. With more frizzy hair, perhaps a scruffy, stained t-shirt, and with dirty, bare feet, it could be a story of despair, loss, and hopelessness. Open the bonnet and make her a spanner monkey, with some creative lighting and perhaps with a streak of oil on her cheek, and you have a classic ’sassy mechanic’ shot. Sat in the car, perhaps in a bikini, or even nude, it’s a different story again.
I think this photo is an excellent counter-example of the above. All the elements are there: The model is attractive and sultry, the background looks bloody amazing and is well cropped, and the lighting is quite beautiful. However, you haven’t captured the ’soul’ of the photo, and we’re left with an image that, whilst interesting to look at and quite pretty, doesn’t move me at all.
That doesn’t meant that the photo is beyond saving, of course — technically, it’s close to perfect (the only thing I’d address is the lighter area in the top right of the image. Getting someone to stand in the way of the sunlight, setting up a screen, or just cropping / editing it out in Photoshop would take care of that), and as I say, both the model and the setting have a lot of potential.
… Which semi-elegantly leads me to the last image of today’s critique. Another photo of Mika:
This photo fills me with wonder. What’s going on? Why is she stood in the sunshine in front of a half-pointed wall? Her eyes are kind of closed. Is she tired? Is she reacting to the sun? Is she on drugs? She does look sort of suspicious. Is she trying to hide from something or someone? Is she suspicious herself, of does she mistrust the photographer? Is she angry at the photographer?
With an initial impression like that, you’re bound to catch the attention of onlookers, which is a great start in the battle towards getting a photo noticed.
On a technical level, I think I’m not too fond of the sharp side-light. The shadow of her eyelashes on her nose is not particularly flattering, and while it does look as if you’ve used a reflector to lighten up the ‘dark’ side of her face (did you? Or is it merely light reflected back off the wall? It doesn’t look as if there is enough wall surface for that amount of light reflection), it isn’t quite enough. The main thing I have a problem with from a technical point of view, is that even in this photo, it’s possible to see that the model has absolutely gorgeous eyes. We want to be able to see them properly! A fill-flash would definitely have come in handy here. While you’re at it, perhaps a little bit more light on the wall behind the model as well — the sharp contrast between the white and the light olive colours carry this image — use it!
Right, with all that out of the way, let me say that this image is bloody good. Just like the first image, it harbours a lot of emotion and it tells (or rather, hides) a story. The light is low on the horizon, which to me says ‘evening’ or ‘morning’. Based on the make-up, I want to think evening. Or is it morning? Is her tiredness because she’s been out all night? But she doesn’t sweaty or messy enough to be out all night…
Obviously, I haven’t got the faintest idea who the model is, nor what her relationship to the photographer is, nor what her personality is like. Conflicting images of misspent youth, worry, intelligence, drug abuse, perhaps. Whatever it is, this photo oozes feeling, emotion, and — yes — soul.
Right, I do realise that this is the least useful critique I’ve done on here in a long time. There’s just something that really works in this image, and it drives me spare that I can’t put my finger on what it is. I have an idea I’ll come back to this image many times in the future, and every time, I’ll be left wondering. It’s a sign of unbridled greatness. Sort out the technical details, and you’re on to a proper winner. Thank you so much for sharing this.
Can anybody else add anything to the critiques? Do you agree? Not sure? Do you completely disagree? Well that’s what the comments are for.
Photo critique on Photocritic
You are currently reading a photo critique post (hence this funky little information box). I hope you like it! Feel free to leaf through our past photo critique posts.
If you would like your own images critiqued, please feel free to submit your photos for critique.
If you have further insights, suggestions, or examples of things discussed in this critique, it would be very valuable - both to the photographer, to me, and to my other readers - if you would share your insights by commenting on this post.
Do you like this article? Tell the world using one of these:
[
Digg
|
Facebook
| 
del.icio.us
| 
Stumble Upon ]
reddit_url='http://www.photocritic.org/portraiture-borrow-their-soul/'
Categories: Photo critique | Photo tips
Tags:
This entry is © Haje Jan Kamps / Photocritic.org, and was posted on Tuesday, March 27th, 2007. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
here
#1 - March 27th, 2007 at 08:13
With regards to the second photo, there’s something that looks ‘off’ about Mika’s eyes. It detracts from the photo.
You mentioned the sharp sidelight in the third photo, but I’m also finding it distracting in the second, coming from the opposite direction.
Photo three is in dire need of lights. Something to brighten up her eyes and something to offset that hard shadow. This has the look of an available light shot at sunset.
It’s hard when you’re starting out and can’t afford lights. All you can shoot is available light. If nothing else, those 43″ reflectors you can get for $60-75 are pretty useful for offsetting a harsh sidelight like this one.
I’m excited because I will finally have some proper lighting equipment to fix stuff like this tomorrow.
Of the three images, the first one is sticking with me the most. The reflection of the photographer in the shot bothers me, but the whole thing is just unconventional and interesting. It has a lot more depth than the other two.
#2 - March 28th, 2007 at 00:06
All regards to Andrew, its awful when someone who think he knows something desides what other people photos should look like. Really, why there should be more sidelight? To get it look more expensive and to kill the atmosphere? There is no perfect photo and there isnt anything particular what one could do to make a photo better.
#3 - March 28th, 2007 at 06:32
JR: There should be more sidelight to balance out the photo.
This is not a case of being elitist, neither is it a case of ‘knowing best’. All I do - and all Andrew does - is to offer kind, polite advice and suggestions on how to improve three already pretty damn good photos.
I don’t want to seem offensive, but your comment isn’t actually helping. Where are your suggestions for improvement?
#4 - April 2nd, 2007 at 14:06
#1 - Sure it’s different, but not the kind of different I like. To my eyes, the image is way too noisy and the more you try to read into it, the worse it gets. I dunno, that one is just not for me.
#2 - Probably my favorite of the three, but I agree the sidelight is to harsh and needs to be balanced a bit. Of course, harsh sidelight is what the photographer might have intended?
#3 - Once again, I think the sidelight is just way to harsh. I think a reflector would have help out tremendously.
I guess all my comments sound sort of harsh, but that’s what the guy wanted… I think the last two images are almost great, but need just a few tweaks to get them where they need to be. The first image, however….
#5 - April 6th, 2007 at 00:13
The Aborigines (or Indigenous Australians if you prefer) have similar beliefs about having a soul captured by the taking of a photograph, though this is probably restricted to the more rural tribes that still maintain a more traditional way of life, rather than the urbanised Aborigines in the towns and cities.
#6 - May 14th, 2007 at 19:42
I found the 3rd photograph to be a bit dreary… I pulled the photo off the blog just out of curiosity opened In cs2, this is actually a hobby of mine, I like to practice my photoshop skills on other peoples photos, I can sometimes be too close to my work. Try it for yourself…. I opened in cs2, went to image, match color and then pumped up the luminance to by 100% and the color intensity by about 50… both need to be changed according to taste. I thought the results were nice. warmest regards to all.
#7 - May 24th, 2007 at 17:07
[…] I said a while back (and again in a more recent photo critique), photography is very much about telling stories, and while you are using a visual medium to do so, […]
#8 - May 30th, 2007 at 00:03
I think the problem with the 3rd picture is not that it needs more side-light, it just needs a different color. If you look at the brick on the right of the picture, the part in shadow, you see that it has a yellow tint to it, either from a yellow reflection, or bright incandescent or sodium lamps. This is the same kind of tint in the shadows on that side of her face. It is not a flattering color, even for a mood shot.
I think what would have helped, would have been a silver reflector on that side, making the sidelight more natural light, rather than the yellowish light. This would have allowed the natural beige color of the brick to come out, while allowing her natural skin color to come out in the shadows.
Just my couple of cents worth.
#9 - June 5th, 2007 at 03:53
I must respectfully beg to differ on the second photo. I see a story there. I see a young woman in less than ideal circumstances in some area full of urban blight. Most of the people in her neighborhood are doomed to die into the same squalor in which they were born. But she’s getting out. She’s working at night as either a prostitute or a stripper, and going to school in the daytime. I think she has a look of confidence. Her stance suggests to me an attitude of “Come and get me if you think you’re able… but you may pull back a bloody stump where your hand used to be.” The lighting is not the best, but thats because for the time being she must remain in her shadowy world.
Funny thing is I don’t usually see that much of a story in photos, but that one “grabbed” me. Perhaps it was my current mood and had I seen it another time, it might not have been apparent to me.
#10 - November 28th, 2007 at 20:19
I can’t critique the first photo; it just doesn’t appeal to my taste. That does not mean there is anything wrong with it though.
The second photo - I like the idea in general. What bothers me about it is that the lit side of the face is too lit and the shadow-side is too much in shadow although, this is in relation to the rest of how her body is lit. Her legs are lit in a balanced way meaning you can see both of them. Though the one arm is fully shaded, it is clear, seperate. The shaded side of the face, you can only guess at and that’s the part that disturbs me about this photo. Other than that, it’s good. The top right and right lights area a bit distracting, but not too bad really. Had this been done in b&w, it might have worked better. If in b&w, I would say you shot at box speed and that’s the reason for the blown out highlight, overly dark shadow. I do like the photo though, very much.
The third photo - overall I like it. The skin-tone/highlights are well done, the shadow is too dark for my taste. Just a bit more light on the shaded side of her face would relieve some tension that is uncomfortable to me.
There are two shadows in the photo, one to the right (her left) and one behind her, though that one is more difuse. That could be from reflection, don’t know. I like the available light feel of it overall though.
It took me a while to figure this part out, and it is subtle, nothing major - your models shoulders are square to the camera and don’t reflect what her head is doing. The feeling of that is somehow disturbing to me though I’m not sure why. Had she turned her shoulders just a bit, maybe so there was a bit more relief on the left side of her body, the “missing limb” thought would not be there.
Anyway, for what it’s worth, I like your photos very much. These are all minor points but points that, in the long-run, might make a difference for you. Good luck in your ventures and thank you for giving us an opportunity to look at your photos the way we should all be looking at our own photos.
Tim